Twelve-day quintuple regime containing four antibiotics as a rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in the central region of Portugal

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple therapy in many countries are clinically unacceptable. Fluoroquinolone resistance is increasing and jeopardizing secondline regimens. There is a growing need for an effective strategy in patients who failed previous therapies. Methods: This is a single-center, non-randomized clinical study conducted in the central region of Portugal. Sixty-four patients were included with a positive 13C-urea breath test (UBT) or histology for H. pylori, and at least one failed eradication attempt. The patient cohort included 71.7% of females with a median of age of 52 (range 23-87). They were treated with a twelve-day regimen consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) bid, amoxicillin at 1,000 mg 12/12h and levofloxacin at 500 mg bid during the first seven days, followed by PPI bid, clarithromycin at 500 mg 12/12 h and either tinidazole or metronidazole at 500 mg bid/tid for five days. Eradication was assessed by UBT. The local Ethics Committee approved this study. Results: Eradication therapy was prescribed due to dyspepsia (66.7%), peptic ulcer (10%) and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). The median number of failed therapies was one (range 1-4). The eradication rate was 64.6% according to an intention-to-treat analysis (95% CI: 53-77%), and 70% by the per-protocol analysis (95% CI: 58-82%). Age, smoking, indication for eradication, previous therapies and the use of a second-generation or full-dose PPI did not affect success rates. Conclusions: Even though treatment with four antibiotics was used, this «reinforced» therapy achieved suboptimal results. This fact highlights the lack of effective H. pylori antimicrobials and suggests that second-line treatment in our region should be prescribed according to susceptibility testing (AU)

No disponible

Twelve-day quintuple regime containing four antibiotics as a rescue therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in the central region of Portugal.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates with standard triple therapy in many countries are clinically unacceptable. Fluoroquinolone resistance is increasing and jeopardizing second-line regimens. There is a growing need for an effective strategy in patients who failed previous therapies. METHODS: This is a single-center, non-randomized clinical study conducted in the central region of Portugal. Sixty-four patients were included with a positive 13C-urea breath test (UBT) or histology for H. pylori, and at least one failed eradication attempt. The patient cohort included 71.7% of females with a median of age of 52 (range 23-87). They were treated with a twelve-day regimen consisting of a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) bid, amoxicillin at 1,000 mg 12/12 h and levofloxacin at 500 mg bid during the first seven days, followed by PPI bid, clarithromycin at 500 mg 12/12h and either tinidazole or metronidazole at 500 mg bid/tid for five days. Eradication was assessed by UBT. The local Ethics Committee approved this study. RESULTS: Eradication therapy was prescribed due to dyspepsia (66.7%), peptic ulcer (10%) and thrombocytopenia (8.3%). The median number of failed therapies was one (range 1-4). The eradication rate was 64.6% according to an intention-to-treat analysis (95% CI: 53-77%), and 70% by the per-protocol analysis (95% CI: 58-82%). Age, smoking, indication for eradication, previous therapies and the use of a second-generation or full-dose PPI did not affect success rates. CONCLUSIONS: Even though treatment with four antibiotics was used, this "reinforced" therapy achieved suboptimal results. This fact highlights the lack of effective H. pylori antimicrobials and suggests that second-line treatment in our region should be prescribed according to susceptibility testing.

Levofloxacin or Clarithromycin-based quadruple regimens: what is the best alternative as first-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori eradication in a country with high resistance rates for both antibiotics?

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates in Portugal are declining, due to increased resistance of this bacterium to antimicrobial agents, especially Clarithromycin. Quadruple Levofloxacin-containing regimens could be an option for first-line treatment, but its efficacy should be evaluated as fluoroquinolone resistance is rapidly increasing. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin-based sequential quadruple therapies as first-line treatment options and determine factors associated with treatment failure. METHODS: A total of 200 Helicobacter pylori infected patients were retrospectively included (female 57.5%; average age: 53.2 ± 15.7) and received either 10-day sequential therapy (Proton-Pump Inhibitor + Amoxicillin 1 g bid for 5 days and Proton-Pump Inhibitor + Clarithromycin 500 mg + Metronidazole/Tinidazole 500 mg bid/tid in the following 5 days; group A) or a 10-day modified sequential therapy with Levofloxacin 500 mg id instead of Clarithromycin (group B). Eradication was confirmed with urea breath test. Variables that could influence success rate were analyzed. RESULTS: There were no differences between groups in terms of gender, age, smoking habits and indications for treatment. The eradication rate obtained with Clarithromycin-based sequential treatment was significantly higher than with Levofloxacin-based therapy (90%, CI95%: 84-96% vs. 79%, CI95%: 71-87%, p = 0.001). Using full-dose proton-pump inhibitor and high-dose Metronidazole in group A, and full-dose proton-pump inhibitor and prescription from a Gastroenterologist in group B were associated with eradication success. CONCLUSIONS: Ten-day Levofloxacin-based sequential treatment achieved inadequate efficacy rate (<80%) and should not be adopted as first-line therapy. Standard sequential therapy showed significantly better results in this naïve population. Using full-dose proton-pump inhibitor and higher doses of Metronidazole is essential to achieve such results.

Portal Hypertensive Biliopathy: An Infrequent Cause of Biliary Obstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Biliary obstruction is usually caused by choledocholithiasis. However, in some circumstances, alternative or concurring unusual ethiologies such as portal hypertensive biliopathy (PHB) must be considered. CLINICAL CASE: We present the case of a 36-year-old female complaining of jaundice and pruritus. Liver function tests were compatible with biliary obstruction and the ultrasound scan of the abdomen showed dilatation of the intrahepatic biliary ducts, a dilated common bile duct (CBD) and biliary calculi. The computed tomography of the abdomen revealed a portal cavernoma encasing the CBD. DISCUSSION: Portal cavernoma, the hallmark of extrahepatic portal venous obstruction, can cause PHB. When symptomatic, chronic cholestasis is present if a dominant stricture exists whereas biliary pain and acute cholangitis occur when choledocholithiasis prevails. Management must be individualized and usually includes endoscopic therapy to address choledocholithiasis and shunt surgery for definitive treatment.

INTRODUÇÃO: A causa mais comum de icterícia obstrutiva é a coledocolitíase. No entanto, no contexto clínico adequado, devem ser consideradas etiologias alternativas ou concomitantes, nomeadamente a biliopatia hipertensiva portal (BHP). CASO CLÍNICO: Apresentamos o caso de uma doente do sexo feminino com 36 anos de idade com icterícia e prurido. O estudo bioquímico era compatível com icterícia obstrutiva e o estudo ecográfico do abdómen revelou dilatação das vias biliares intra-hepáticas e do colédoco associados a litíase biliar. A tomografia computorizada abdominal realizada mostrou a existência um cavernoma da veia porta a envolver o colédoco. DISCUSSÃO: O cavernoma da porta, no contexto de obstrução portal venosa extra-hepática pode complicar-se com BHP. Quando sintomática manifesta-se por colestase crónica caso exista uma estenose dominante ou dor biliar e/ou colangite aguda quando predomina a litíase. O tratamento definitivo é individualizado, incluindo terapêutica endoscópica visando a litíase associada e uma derivação cirúrgica venosa porto-sistémica.

Left-Sided Portal Hypertension: A Sinister Entity.

INTRODUCTION: Sinistral, or left-sided, portal hypertension (SPH) is a rare entity, with multiple potential causes. Gastrointestinal variceal bleeding and hypersplenism are its' major clinical manifestations. The main aim of the present study is to summarize the clinical features of patients with SPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with present or previous diagnosis of SHP, observed in a Gastroenterology Department, in a period of 2 years. Patients with clinical, radiological or laboratory alterations suggestive of cirrhosis were excluded. Causes of SPH, clinical manifestations and outcomes were registered. Potential factors associated with gastrointestinal bleeding were analyzed. RESULTS: In the study period a total of 22 patients (male - 17; mean age - 59.6 ± 10.6 years) with SHP were included. Clinical manifestations were: asymptomatic/unspecific abdominal pain (n = 14); gastrointestinal bleeding (n = 8). Eleven (50%) patients had increased aminotransferases, GGT and/or alkaline phosphatase although liver function was normal in all of them. Causes of SPH were chronic pancreatitis (n = 7), acute pancreatitis (n = 7), pancreatic cancer (n = 4), pancreatic surgery (n = 3) and arteriovenous malformation (n = 1). All patients had gastric and/or esophageal varices and seven had splenomegaly. Five (22.7%) had thrombocytopenia, associated with hypersplenism. Five patients (22.7%) were submitted to endoscopic treatment and eight were submitted to splenic artery embolization and/or splenectomy. There were no cases of variceal rebleeding and two patients died. Patients without liver enzymes elevation had a higher probability of gastrointestinal bleeding (87.5% vs. 28.6%; p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: Acute and chronic pancreatitis are the major causes of SHP. Gastrointestinal bleeding is the most important clinical manifestation and patients without liver enzyme elevation seem more prone to bleed. Specific treatment is seldom performed or needed.

INTRODUÇÃO: A hipertensão portal esquerda ou sinistra (HTPS) é uma entidade rara, que pode resultar de diferentes etiologias. A hemorragia gastrointestinal de origem varicosa e o hiperesplenismo são as principais manifestações clínicas. O principal objetivo do presente estudo consiste em estabelecer os achados clínicos mais relevantes num grupo de doentes com HTPS. DOENTES E MÉTODOS: Foi efetuada uma análise retrospetiva de um grupo consecutivo de doentes com HTPS diagnosticados ou acompanhados no serviço de Gastrenterologia durante o período de 2 anos. Os doentes com estigmas clínicos, radiológicos ou laboratoriais sugestivos de cirrose hepática foram excluídos. Foram registadas as etiologias, manifestações clínicas, tratamentos e evolução. Também foram analisados potenciais fatores associados com hemorragia digestiva como forma de apresentação. RESULTADOS: Neste período foram incluídos 22 doentes (sexo masculino ­ 17; média etária ­ 59,6 ± 10,6 anos). As manifestações clínicas foram: assintomático/dor abdominal inespecífica (n = 14); hemorragia gastrointestinal (n = 8). A função hepática era normal em todos os doentes mas 11 (50%) apresentavam uma elevação da enzimologia hepática (aminotransferases, GGT e/ou fosfatase alcalina). As principais etiologias da HTPS foram a pancreatite crónica (n = 7), a pancreatite aguda (n = 7), os carcinomas pancreáticos (n = 4), as cirurgias pancreáticas prévias (n = 3) e uma malformação arterio-venosa (n = 1). Foram identificadas varizes gástricas e/ou esofágicas em todos os doentes e 7 apresentavam esplenomegália. A trombocitopenia, associada ao hiperesplenismo, estava presente em 5 doentes (22,7%). Cinco doentes foram submetidos a tratamento endoscópico e oito foram sujeitos a embolização da artéria esplénica e/ou esplenectomia. Não se verificaram casos de recidiva hemorrágica e ocorreram duas mortes. Os doentes sem alterações da enzimologia hepática foram os mais propensos a apresentar hemorragia gastrointestinal (87,5% vs. 28,6%; p = 0,024). CONCLUSÕES: A pancreatite aguda e a pancreatite crónica são as principais causas da HTPS. A hemorragia gastrointestinal é a manifestação clínica mais relevante e os doentes sem alterações da enzimologia hepática parecem apresentar um risco superior para desenvolver esta complicação. O tratamento específico raramente é necessário/realizado.